LGBTQ Voice 2012: Catherine Ryan Hyde on Defending the Rainbow
Defending the Rainbow
This is hardly an original thought, but it would be nice to
live in a world where we didn’t have to create a special LGBTQ genre for
literature. It would also be nice to live in a world without affirmative
action, but only if no affirmative action was needed. And that’s not the world
we live in now.
To get LGBTQ stories to the LGBTQ teens (and other readers)
who need them requires direct action. Somebody has to monitor the health of the
genre, and, more importantly, defend it. The “Don’t Say Gay” crowd certainly
doesn’t want anyone to write about it, either, and I’m afraid it would be
painfully easy to for them to get their way if we didn’t offer up a unified
front.
It may seem like an odd comparison, but when my novel Pay It
Forward was adapted for film, the African American main character turned white.
He turned into Kevin Spacey. And I watched as a lot of people said that was
okay, because casting should be “colorblind.” It’s a nice concept on paper,
this colorblindness, but if it truly worked, then lots of white characters
would turn African American as well. Unfortunately, colorblindness can just be
a white-washed way of describing the process by which we turn a blind eye to
prejudice.
I should also mention that I had two minor gay characters
and one fairly major transgender character in that book. No, you didn’t blink
and miss them in the movie. They disappeared. So it’s pretty clear that
colorblindness can and will eliminate our rainbow if we let it.
In a perfect world, about 10%-20% of fictional characters
should be LGBTQ, because that’s a roughly accurate representation of the world,
so far as I know (my apologies if I’m misstating the statistic). But we are so
not there yet. And until we get there, I think we need to continue to separate
out LGBTQ fiction to honor it, to make it easy for teens to find it, and to
monitor its ongoing health.
I never really set out to write exclusively, or even mainly,
LGBTQ fiction, despite my own sexual orientation. In no other way do I tie my
characters to my own experience. I write about all kinds of people who are
different from me. Male characters, the mentally ill (some would say that’s
open for debate), Viet Nam veterans, children…part of the joy of being a writer
is finding the universality in all humans, and being able to imagine the
experience of someone you’re not. If I told you that my overall life background
falls somewhere between bisexual and gay (which is true, it does) you might
think that factors into my ability and/or willingness to write straight
characters. But it doesn’t seem to work that way. For years I had a pushback
against writing a straight female character with a love interest, because I
couldn’t find the enthusiasm to relate to her feelings for that man. So if I knew
the character wanted to be straight, I’d write from a male point of view.
For reasons I can’t possibly fathom, that block evaporated.
And now my character simply tells me who he or she is. And I would no sooner
reject that simple truth than I would reject a new friend for being straight. I
would hope that the idea here is unity rather than more separation.
All that said, when I got into Young Adult literature
(where, frankly, it doesn’t seem I will stay), two out of five of my YA books, Becoming
Chloe and Jumpstart the World, fit distinctly into the LGBT genre. And that’s
no accident. I felt that a lot more such literature was needed for teens. (This
was around the mid 2000s, but I’d still like to see the numbers come up.) So I
contributed some. And of course it’s a subject close to my heart, because I
know how it feels to grow up without the books you need. No kid
should have to get The Well of Loneliness out of the library and try to make
sense of that depressing, archaic, boring tome. I’m guessing only a few people
who will read this are even old enough to understand the reference, but before
Rubyfruit Jungle, there just wasn’t much, and what there was stank badly.
We’ve come a long way, but we still have a long way to go.
Yes, I’m in favor of a future in which books are not gay or
straight, but simply books. And in reading a sampling of books in this
imaginary new world, one will see straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual,
transgender, questioning, intersex, and a rainbow of gender-nonconforming
characters represented in about the same numbers they appear in life. I’m
optimistic, yet a realist—I’m not holding my breath on living to see this.
In the meantime, it’s essential that we not pretend we are
any closer to that ideal than we really are. Until then, yes, we carefully
create and defend a separate genre of our fiction, because it’s needed. Because
it saves lives. With an epidemic of LGBT suicides in recent months and years,
we’d be foolish, in my opinion, to treat LGBTQ fiction as anything less than a life-or-death
issue. If we stand for life, we make a strong stand for our books.
Catherine Ryan Hyde is an award-winning author of both adult and young adult fiction. Her debut adult novel, Pay it Forward, was made into a film, and her most recent YA novel, Jumpstart the World, has received two Rainbow Awards and is up for two Lambda Literary awards. You can learn more about Catherine at her website.






















2 comments:
This makes me want to read PAY IT FORWARD. (I saw the movie, which made me cry for hours and turned me off reading the book.)
I think schools have a big part to play in this. In the UK there is still very little on library shelves and as children make their preconceptions early on, there needs to be great LGB literature in primary schools (I teach Primary). At this age, books do not need to talk about sexuality, but they need to be inclusive and show diversity at its best. Maybe then we would start to have a world where affirmative action is redundant. I hope this makes sense.
Post a Comment